WHO WAS GIVING OUT THE CHALLENGE?
Ans: An unknown Ministry called PYEM, run by Anowarul Kabir, who claims to be an ex-muslim...



WHAT IS PYEM?
Ans:Founded in 2010 by S.M. Anowarul Kabir, an Ex-Muslim Christian from Bangladesh, PYEM™ is a ministry dedicated to putting an end to the ongoing global oppression and terrorism being carried out by followers of Islam and its self-proclaimed prophet Muhammed, by exposing the lies of Islam(Click here to see more)




WHAT IS THE CLAIM?
Ans:The claim that,"STUDY REVEALS THAT SATAN HAD INTERCOURSE WITH AAMINA, MOTHER OF MUHAMMAD, AND GAVE BIRTH TO HIM"(Click here for more)




WHAT IS THE CHALLENGE?
Ans:Any muslim who can refute/debunk THIS claim will be awarded with $20,000 US dollars in cash.



HERE IS THE OFFICIAL RESPONSE


CLAIM NO. ONE: AAMINA PBUH WAS A PAGAN PROSTITUTE


REFUTATION: Aamina PBUH was daughter of Wahb ibn `Abd Manaf ibn Zuhrah ibn Kilab ibn Murrah.[1] Aminah was born in Makkah. She was a member of the Banu Zuhrah clan in the tribe of Quraysh who were descendants of Ibrahim (Abraham) through his son Isma'il (Ishmael). Her ancestor Zuhrah was the elder brother of Qusayy ibn Kilab, who was also an ancestor of 'Abdallah ibn 'Abdul Muttalib. Qusayy ibn Kilab became the first Quraysh custodian of the Holy Ka'bah. 'Abdul Muttalib ibn Hashim, father of 'Abdallah, fixed the marriage of his youngest son 'Abdallah with Aminah. She was eventually married to 'Abdallah ibn 'Abd al-Muttalib when he was 17 years old.[2] It was said that 'Abdallah's face shone with a special light and that this light was the promise of a Prophet as offspring.[3]

'Abdallah's father was the custodian of the Holy Ka'bah in Makkah. Soon after their marriage 'Abdallah would be called to as-Sham (present day Syria) on a trading caravan. However, 'Abdallah would become sick and would die before returning to Makkah and his pregnant wife; a depression from which Aminah would never recover.[4]

POINT NO.1: She was from one of the most noble families of Makkah, this is clear from the tribe she belonged to... Had she been a prostitute, who could have bothered to marry her... Moreover the custodian of Kabba was an esteemed post, you cant think of a person being on such a big post marry his children to a prostitute.. The marriage was fixed by elders, that too suggests that Aamina was a devoted child.. Abdullah PBUH had never seen her before, this also suggests that her character was well acknowledged..




CLAIM NO. 2: "Muhammed is Satan's own begotten son."


Reasons given for the same by the PYEM are given below:


THIS IS A SCREENSHOT TAKEN FROM PYEM's official web page


Now, what has this hadith to do with the claim, they explain it further:




THIS IS ALSO A SCREENSHOT TAKEN FROM PYEM's official web page


THUS PYEM CONCLUDES THAT MUHAMMAD PBUH WAS THE BEGGOTEN CHILD OF SATAN


Well Well Well!!!!! Did you smell the rat?


Let us analyse his claims,


What does the hadith prove?


The hadith doesn't prove any point regarding the claim...
The Hadith is clearly directed to people who were living in times of Prophet PBUH and those living after Him...(Even if it was directed to them, it still doesn't prove anything)
If this hadith were to apply before him, then all prophets of the past were the same as Muhammad was (May GOD forgive me for writing it)...
Historically, Muhammad PBUH brought new laws as Moses PBUH did in his times... What does it mean... New laws are not applied to old people... That means this law was not there before... It was formulated by Muhammad and had to be applied after that very time... Moreover Islam believes in intentions, e.g. if anyone who doesn't know this rule and doesn't have any way of seeking knowledge about it, he wont be put under this rule... He simply isn't eligible for it...
(Don't confuse new laws* with new religion... New laws were given to Moses PBUH earlier and later to Muhammad PBUH*... The fundamentals of the religion remained the same i.e. strict monotheism)


The Shariah keeps on changing according to needs, this is clear from many Hadith and Qura'nic verses:


For wrongdoing on the part of the Jews, We made unlawful for them [certain] good foods which had been lawful to them, and for their averting from the way of Allah many [people],(surah Nisa 4:160)


'The sabbath was only appointed for those who differed over it. And indeed, your Lord will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.(Nahl 16:124)


Similarly the changing of Kabilah also shows that laws can change.....




Coming to the interpretation of this Hadith by the scholars:




"ONE OF THE GREATEST MUSLIM SCHOLARS"
DID ALLAH SWT SAY THIS?  NO!!!!
DID MUHAMMAD PBUH SAY IT?  NO!!!!
DID ANY PROPHET SAY IT?  NO!!!!
DID ANY ONE OF THE SAHABA SAY IT?  NO!!!!


Then who says it????? Well the question is enough for another discussion...


THE MATTER OF FACT IS THAT NONE OF THE MENTIONED SCHOLARS HAVE WRITTEN COMMENTARY ON HADITHS... 


WHATS WRONG WITH THEIR INTERPRETATION?


'THE ONE WHO HAS' DOESN'T MEAN 'THE ONE WHO HAD' IN ANY OF THE WORLD LANGUAGES...... THIS AGAIN SUGGESTS THAT THE INTERPRETATION CANT BE APPLIED ON PAST...


THE OTHER THING ABOUT WRAPPING OF SATAN AROUND ***** COULD AGAIN BE A WRONG INTERPRETATION....
WELL I ASK,
WHO SAID IT,
DID ALLAH SWT SAY IT? NO!!!
DID MUHAMMAD PBUH SAY IT? NO!!!
WHO SAID IT....
WELL YOU KNOW, WHO SAID IT....


THE FINAL POINT WORTH SAYING IS THAT THERE IS NO HADITH IN SUPPORT OF SATAN WRAPPING AROUND *****......


MUHAMMAD PBUH NEVER SAID ANYTHING LIKE THAT....


INTERPRETATION OF HADITH IS DONE BY SEEING DAILY APPLICATION OF THAT HADITH BY SAHABAS OF THE PROPHET HIMSELF...
DID ANY OF THE SAHABAS COMPLAINT THIS THING?
NO?
DID PROPHET SAY SUCH THING TO ANY OF THE SAHABA?
NO...


THERE IS NO MENTION OF SUCH A THING ANYWHERE IN AUTHENTIC SOURCE...
THIS MEANS IT IS A BIDDAH...
BIDDAH IS HARAM...




NOW THE OTHER THING WORTH MENTIONING IS IF MUHAMMAD WAS HARMED BY SAITAN THE THE DUA HAD NOT BEEN READ...


WELL IT IS A GOOD LOGIC....


WHAT IF I SAY THAT THE INTERPRETATION IS ALSO RIGHT (THOUGH I DONT AGREE TO IT), PYEM MINISTRY WILL GET OF THEIR FEET AND THINK THAT WE HAVE NOT REFUTED THEIR CLAIMS...


WELL THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO THINK SO.... BUT I DONT GIVE THEM THIS RIGHT IF THEY READ THIS ARTICLE FURTHER....


I TAKE TWO ASSUMPTIONS THAT THE DUA WAS NOT READ BY MUHAMMAD'S PARENTS AND THE INTERPRETATIONS OF THE "GREAT SCHOLARS" ARE ALSO RIGHT (THOUGH THERE IS NO PROOF OF THESE ASSUMPTIONS, AND I ALSO DONT AGREE WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS)...


DOES IT PROVE ANYTHING!!!!!!!! 
NO!!
NOT AT ALL!!


WHAT IT PROVES IS THAT MUHAMMAD COULD HAVE BEEN HARMED BY SATAN AND SATAN WRAPPED ITSELF OVER THE PENIS OF HIS FATHER (I AGAIN SAY THAT I DON'T AGREE WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS I MADE)... 


"MUHAMMAD PBUH BEING HARMED BY SATAN"
WHAT DID MUHAMMAD PBUH MEAN BY HARM, IT IS A MATTER OF DISCUSSION..
IF IT WAS PHYSICAL HARM, THEN MUHAMMAD WAS NEVER PHYSICALLY HARMED, IF WAS JUST TEMPTING OR PROVOKING THEN ACCORDING TO BIBLE EVEN DAVID AND JESUS BOTH WERE TEMPTED OR PROVOKED BY SATIN...


"SATAN WRAPPED ITSELF OVER THE PENIS"
EVEN IF IT HAPPENED (I DON'T AGREE TO IT), DOES THAT MEAN HE WAS THE BEGGOTEN CHILD OF SATAN,
WAIT A MINUTE, BIBLE SAYS,"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life"


DOES THE BIBLE MEAN THAT GOD THE FATHER HAD BEEN WOUND OVER THE PENIS OF SOMEONE BLA BLA BLA...


ANOTHER QUESTION TO BE ASKED IS, IF I ASK MR. ANOWARUL KABIR, WHOSE BEGOTTEN SON IS HE,
WILL HE REPLY "PENIS" OR HIS FATHER'S NAME...
WELL GO AND ASK THIS QUESTION TO HIM...


THUS WEATHER SATIN WAS ON THE PENIS OR NOT AND WEATHER HE IS MATERIAL OR IMMATERIAL, MUHAMMAD PBUH IS STILL THE SON OF HIS PARENTS NOT OF SATAN...




THANKS FOR READING THIS ARTICLE




And say: “The Truth has arrived, and Falsehood perished: for Falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish.” We send down (stage by stage) in the Quran that which is a healing and a mercy to those who believe: to the unjust it causes nothing but loss after loss. (Surah Al Isra’ 17:81-82)


* I MENTIONED EARLIER IN THIS ARTICLE THAT MUHAMMAD BROUGHT NEW LAWS AS MOSES DID, I DIDN'T MEAN NEW RELIGION...  Isaac, Moses and Jesus and all other prophets were Muslims (They had all submitted their will to God almighty) and they were all right... They had no need to follow Hadith, because Hadith is whatever Muhammad said not what God said.... Once the glorious Qura'n was revealed, we have to follow it and in it we have been told to follow Muhammad PBUH, this was not the case with other prophets they were not told to follow Muhammad PBUH. They were given their own laws... New laws doesn't mean new religion... According to Christians god exists in triune form... Well this law was not before him, does that mean trinity came after Jesus came... The answer will be no if you ask this question to a Christian... They will say it was before also, then is it true that other prophets didn't believe in triune god... Well leave it to Christians... If other prophets also believed in that type of God why isn't such thing in old testament.... Well if it is there why didn't any such thing exist before... WELL WELL WELL ASK THEM WAS THIS A NEW LAW, DID JESUS BRING NEW LAWS DID HE BRING NEW RELIGION..... The question is needed to be answered....
Reactions: 
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

14 Response to "Official Reply By A-PYEM to the $20,000 Challenge....."

  1. Shameem Said,

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 02:43

     
  2. Shameem Said,

    THEY NEED A INDEPENDENT JUDGE ON THIS ... FOR THEY WILL LIE AND OBVIOUSLY THEY WOULDN'T ACCEPT DEFEAT , THOUGH EVERYTHING YOU HAVE STATED IS 100% CORRECT , MAY THE TRUTH REVILE AND FALSEHOOD PERISH

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 02:49

     
  3. habeebthaika Said,

    very nice reply

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 03:12

     
  4. Waleed Mohammed Said,

    Very well said.. Good answer mashallah

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 06:48

     
  5. Brian Said,

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 07:50

     
  6. PYEM Ministry Inc. Said,

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 16:54

     
  7. PYEM Ministry Inc. Said,

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    Posted on 24 February 2011 at 16:55

     
  8. Brian Said,

    PYEM for one that post wasnt from me but fyi your old profile on your blog said you were a homosexual I was asked about it and I defended you. Ask Sam Praise Yeshua said that CP told them you were and Sam asked me and I said I wasnt sure but not that I knew of. As for paltalk believe what you want I am sorry for what happened that night but I was keylogged and my account was used. I had no control over what happened on my account but it was dealt with why should I say sorry when it wasnt me saying this stuff. Anyways I am sorry about the above post guess its time for a new email since mine is being abused. It makes me sick that you think I would actualy stoop to that level and lie if I have issues with anyone I will get on mic and say so anyways I tried to pm you on paltalk so we could handle this and maybe be friends again. I have no issues with you and since you kicked me off your pallist I figured you wanted nothing to do with me so I just gave in and left you alone. ~Brian~ P.S. I pray God will guide you in your ministry keep up the good work.

    Posted on 25 February 2011 at 12:13

     
  9. PYEM Ministry Inc. Said,

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    Posted on 25 February 2011 at 23:56

     
  10. L.M.D Said,

    ^^ Seems like the fire is in the house. :D

    Posted on 26 February 2011 at 10:32

     
  11. Brian Said,

    I never said my computer was hacked I said I had a key logger there is a difference. My account was hacked and I never lied about it I don't even know what was said no one can give me the same answer so who is lying? You and everyone else knows if I get on and say anything I do so in voice I have no problem doing so. You seem to be on a tie raid against any Christian who will not show pure hate to all Muslims. I believe we can share the Gospel with them we are to plant seeds but God will give the increase. I beg you please to not call what you have a Ministry when it is showing hate towards others.

    I do have others tell me you said you were attracted to men but did not act on it I now have seen your explanation so I will grant you that you are being Truthful. Unlike you I can admit when I am wrong. People can think I lied all they want like a TRUE Christian I will forgive them. I ask we do not fight here if you want to say anything more please take it to my facebook or to my pm in paltalk please. You are a good guy and you have zeal I pray that God shows you the right path I have been woken up I was insulting Muslims and making Christ look bad and for that I am sorry I just want Muslims to leave Islam and come to Christ.

    Posted on 26 February 2011 at 10:33

     
  12. MJ Said,

    I am a Christian woman and do not believe islam to be a legitimate religion, however, on this blog, I am appalled at the behavior of the "Christians" on this page. A ministry should not be used to call people out or used for anything other then to glorify God, in a way that is pleasing to Him. Have you ever asked yourself, is what I am claiming or writing, pleasing to God? At the very least you should take this behind the scenes and not be so public in your division. One thing I have to say about muslims is they are united and rarely will you see them belittle each other in public, even when it comes to terroristic acts, they are silent. Please stop this public nonsense, you have distracted from the real subject of what you claim to be and have lessoned your credibility.

    Posted on 26 February 2011 at 11:20

     
  13. Zee Net Said,

    When YHWH made man in "his own image", man had sexual organ, right? Was that also included in the "image" of God?? If yes, did YHWH make use of it while begetting his only begotten child or was it a useless part of Him that is never used?? :O

    Posted on 6 September 2011 at 07:26

     
  14. Anonymous Said,

    @Zee Net

    "This hadith has been transmitted on the authority of Abu Huraira and in the hadith transmitted on the authority of Ibn Hatim Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) is reported to have said: When any one of you fights with his brother, he should avoid his face for Allah created Adam in His own image." - Sahih Muslim 32:6325

    Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, created Adam in His own image with His length of sixty cubits, [...] - Sahih Muslim 40:6809

    Posted on 12 January 2012 at 06:40

     

Post a Comment